Charlottesville autumnal haiku

Just a scribbling from a notebook the other day…

Bricks last three lifetimes,
maple leaves, a season; but
both are the same red.

Once the leaves are gone,
at last you see the ridge of
the Blue Ridge Mountains.

By each student’s door
logs stacked forward and crossways;
no chimneys smoke yet.

[Footnote to the last one: the tiny single rooms on the Lawn are awarded to undergraduates as a particularly high honor. Since the rooms are still heated by the original fireplaces, the university provides firewood, which is stacked in neat woodpiles next to every room.]

On being a city person, part 2: Baltimore

(continued from the previous post)

My mother and I moved to Baltimore when I was four. We lived in Hampden, which had not yet been become artsy-bohemian and was still very blue-collar. I learned my new terrain street by street: first, our block with its steep slope and the tree that blew down in a huge storm when I was six. Then, intersecting it, 36th Street, or the Avenue as people called it, home of the five-and-ten where I clandestinely bought my first tube of lipstick and the bakery with the dusty wedding cake always on display in the window. (The five-and-ten is gone, but the bakery is still there today.)

Then sycamore-lined Roland Avenue, which went north past the fire station and the Roland Water Tower, a local landmark. There was Roosevelt Park off at one end of the neighborhood, and Falls Road running by it. There was our local branch of the Enoch Pratt Free Library,* a modestly neo-classical brick building that looked grand to my eyes and is still the blueprint for most of my library-themed dreams. At least half the credit for my bibliophile tendencies goes to the children’s librarian there, an unfailingly kind woman who would always greet me with "Amanda! Have you read this yet?" and who knew me from the time I was old enough to read until we moved out of the neighborhood nine years after we first arrived.

Then there were were the blocks where my school friends lived ("I’m going to Debbie’s house," "to Angela’s house," all rowhouses that looked more or less like the other houses but which we distinguished by our friends’ names). And there was the astonishing block of 34th Street where in the winter everyone competed to see who could could cram the most Christmas decorations per square foot on their property. This was the block where any given house might have a glowing plastic Santa complete with elves, sleigh, and reindeer on the porch roof; a creche surrounded by glowing plastic snowmen and more Santas on the lawn; strings of multicolored lights covering every vertical surface of the house itself; and electric candles and wreaths in the windows for good measure. They still do it to this day, and it’s now a tourist attraction.

We had no car, but there were two supermarkets within walking distance and you could get downtown on the bus. I walked to my elementary school, which wasn’t far. Most of my classmates lived nearby and did the same. A crossing guard stood watch over the busiest intersection on 36th Street during the times of day we all were en route to and from school.

It was not an idyllic place, or a politically progressive one; the streets were dirty and the sidewalks sprouted dandelions, a fair number of our neighbors were on welfare, the old lady next door had filled every corner of her house with junk, and people flew the confederate flag from their car antennas. Once I saw a pro-KKK bumper sticker on someone’s car in an alley. Once, just after graduating from fifth grade, I told a kid from my school that I was going to a magnet middle school outside the neighborhood, and she said "You’d better be careful. There’s a lot of black people there, and they’ll steal your lunch money." I remember staring at her with my mouth flapping open in shock. So we were not living amongst urban lefty-types, and that was a source of stress to my staunchly Democratic mother; I’d be idealizing my old neighborhood out of all recognition if I elided that out of the picture.

Those who say Hampden is small-townish, a kind of self-contained village, are right. But the appeal of Baltimore is also in its neighborhood-ness, its air of being made up of a bunch of such villages jumbled up against each other and overlapping at the edges. You can watch the texture of life varying from block to block, with certain constants (rowhouses with white marble steps, for instance) remaining in place. As I grew up, my mental map expanded to include other places, some grander, some poorer: the train station, the ravine-y park around Johns Hopkins University, Washington Monument and the turn-of-the-century mansions along Charles Street, the long blighted stretch of Howard Street, the waterfront, Lexington Market, The (infamous) Block with all the decaying strip clubs, the Walters Art Museum.

This would be where the conclusion would go if there were one, but I find, after all this, that there isn’t any. Just that all subsequent cities I’ve lived in or visited have struck a chord that might never have sounded if I’d grown up in a suburb with nowhere to go except miles away by car. Gritty and sad as Baltimore can be, it shaped me. I have a hard time imagining myself not living in cities, and thus it seems like a no-brainer to me that amenities like transportation and schools and libraries should be available to the public and shared by everyone. And that other people in all their singularity and freakishness should always be nearby, and that my life isn’t detachable from theirs, even when I’m wandering in perfect anonymous contentment along one of the streets I so often return to (as I return to the library) in my dreams.

(Plus, my neighborhood, for all its reactionariness, has always inspired John Waters. Which I like to think of as contributing to my fondness for the campy and the surreal.)

There, that’s what I wanted to say. And I’m having a fit of nostalgia for my home town now.

* Which just won an award for its virtual reference service! I didn’t know that before Googling it. Hurrah for the Pratt!

On being a city person

This is a kind of riff on a conversation going on in various places, most recently this post of Dr. B’s. Also, I’m still thinking about citizenship and what it means. This post is going to wander about and spill over into the next post.

I like being alone. (Those of you who read this blog regularly are probably rolling your eyes right now and saying "No, really? I’m shocked.") I’m a classic introvert: if I don’t get to spend at least part of the day not interacting with other people, I get miserable. However, I am, at a molecular level, a city person. I’m happiest having my alone time in a neighborhood with hundreds of other people above and below and next door and passing by on the street.  Even now, living at the edge of town rather than close to its center, I feel a bit isolated. If I lived in a really rural area, I think I’d be deeply lonely.

Take a concrete example that came up in Dr. B’s comments: transit. In a silly meme post a while back, I said something about how "certain types of people’s fear and disdain of public transportation" is one of my pet peeves. Let me offer an anecdote. One spring break while I was in graduate school in the Great Upper Midwest, two friends and I decided to go on a road trip to Chicago. While there, we had lunch with Friend E’s friend, G, who had been living in Chicago for a while; the restaurant was in Chinatown, so I suggested that E and F and I take the El, since it’s such a quintessential part of the Chicago experience ("the cheapest roller coaster ride in the city," it’s been called), and when I lived in Chicago as an undergrad, I took it all the time to get downtown. When we mentioned to G how we got to the restaurant, she was horrified: "You took the El? I’m scared to take the El! I’ve never taken it! I’ll drive you back, don’t worry!" I considered pointing out to her that her chances of becoming a violent crime statistic were probably higher in a deserted parking garage after dark than on a train car full of people, and I’d never once been hassled on the El, but decided against it. E said, on another occasion, that she hated taking the bus because all the "freaks" rode the bus. (She’s not alone in this opinion; check out this GM-sponsored ad discouraging people from taking public transit.)

I’m troubled by the mindset that everyone has to do their own thing, have their own vehicle, own their own house, go their own way, pull their own weight, not lean on other people, not reach out, not connect, not be reminded of the millions of other lives going on in the world (and if you don’t, you’re a freak, or a naive Pollyanna who’ll just get mugged or knifed). It’s the same thing that bothers me when I read about how people in this country are getting less and less involved with social groups outside their families, bowling by themselves, not going to the movies when they can sit in their living rooms and enjoy "home theater," and retreating more and more into the private sphere.

Have you seen those commercials for that coffeemaker that’s supposed to make coffee-shop-quality coffee right in your own kitchen? And the accompanying visual is a busy sidewalk café that suddenly vanishes and is replaced by one of the coffeemakers brewing away right there on the sidewalk, and then we cut to the same coffeemaker in someone’s kitchen? That commercial always makes my heart sink a little lower in my chest. It took me a while to figure out just why it’s so depressing, but it’s because the advertisers have missed the whole point of why people go to coffee places. It’s not the coffee, most of the time. It’s the being at a table and reading in the company of other people who are also sitting and reading the newspaper, or talking to the other people, or whatever. It’s a communal experience. But the really depressing thing about that commercial is that maybe the advertisers are on to something, after all, and people really would rather drink coffee in the privacy of their own homes than go somewhere and watch the world go by. Or that people just don’t have the time anymore (this is a whole other rant, so I will bracket it for the time being).

It’s sort of hypocritical of me to say all this, I suppose, because I’ve never really been a poster child for community involvement, and I have in the past tended to be a stubbornly independent individualist who avoided human contact. But I think this was in part because I spent my life in cities, where one can take for granted that there will always be other people around. There’s something comforting about city life for introverts: you can be left alone, thanks to all the little rituals city people have for preserving minimal levels of separateness in a crowd, but you’re never totally isolated, and you’re always aware, as Dr. B says, of all these other people leading their lives, many of them not like yours, so you can be relieved that you’re not the only weirdo out there. You can be your independent self, but you don’t lose the interconnection. If that makes sense.

Anyway, I’m still thinking this through. So let me talk for a while about Baltimore, where I spent the better part of my childhood, and maybe that will explain some of what I’m wanting to say.

(To be continued in the next post.)

Die spam die

If you’re wondering why I’ve closed the comments on all posts over a month old, it’s because there’s been the beginnings of an upsurge in comment spam here lately. If you’d really like to comment on an older entry, send me an e-mail and I’ll re-open the comments on it for you.

There’s got to be a very special level of hell reserved for spammers…

The sopping Friday

It rained all day today, a cold damp drizzly day with most of the leaves off the trees. In the morning there was heavy fog; I always measure fogginess by whether I can see the hill off to the west of the Alderman Library as I head up the steps each morning, and today it was invisible. The library’s foyer was full of umbrellas. (People here put their umbrellas down near the door when they come in and leave them there until they go, a nice gesture of trust that no one will steal one’s umbrella.) A good day to be indoors; I wish I had a fireplace to sit in front of.

It was a day that reminded me of Edward Gorey’s The Sopping Thursday, of the "damp, drizzly November in my soul" that Ishmael complains of in Chapter 1 of Moby-Dick, and of the opening sentence of Jane Eyre: "There was no possibility of taking a walk that day." But more than anything else, today reminded me of Sylvia Plath’s "Black Rook in Rainy Weather":

On the stiff twig up there

Hunches a wet black rook

Arranging and rearranging its feathers in the rain.

I do not expect a miracle

Or an accident

To set the sight on fire
In my eye, nor seek
Any more in the desultory weather some design,
But let spotted leaves fall as they fall,
Without ceremony, or portent.

Although, I admit, I desire,
Occasionally, some backtalk
From the mute sky, I can’t honestly complain:
A certain minor light may still
Lean incandescent

Out of kitchen table or chair
As if a celestial burning took
Possession of the most obtuse objects now and then —
Thus hallowing an interval
Otherwise inconsequent

By bestowing largesse, honor,
One might say love. At any rate, I now walk
Wary (for it could happen
Even in this dull, ruinous landscape); skeptical,
Yet politic; ignorant

Of whatever angel may choose to flare
Suddenly at my elbow. I only know that a rook
Ordering its black feathers can so shine
As to seize my senses, haul
My eyelids up, and grant

A brief respite from fear
Of total neutrality. With luck,
Trekking stubborn through this season
Of fatigue, I shall
Patch together a content

Of sorts. Miracles occur,
If you care to call those spasmodic
Tricks of radiance miracles. The wait’s begun again,
The long wait for the angel,
For that rare, random descent.

I was only going to quote the first few stanzas, but then, after hunting this poem up online and rereading it for the first time in some years, I noticed the utter appropriateness of the bit about "Trekking stubborn through this season / Of fatigue, I shall / Patch together a content / Of sorts." (I think that’s going to be my new tagline.) She’s so stubborn, Plath is, in her refusal to get her hopes up, her wary backing away from anything that looks too miraculous, and yet so poised to see it even so, "even in this dull, ruinous landscape." And isn’t it always the "fear / Of total neutrality," the blank nothingness of apathy, that sets in most readily in a rainy November in a season of fatigue?

And you, Reader? What do you read in November when it rains?

On citizenship

… I can’t be the only 32-year-old in this country waking up, rubbing her eyes, and realizing she doesn’t know how to break out of apathy, doesn’t know how to pitch in, doesn’t know the most elementary things about political action. Little Dutch child staring at the dam with no idea where to stick a finger. Not that a finger will do anything much, at this point; we’re so terribly far beyond that.

Doesn’t matter, though, because a finger in the dam is practice. Practically nobody learns to be an effective, involved political actor overnight, I should think. It’s a little like what I’m told about soldiering (despite having no actual experience therein): you practice until the right thing happens under fire without your having to will it to.

We’re under fire now, a lot of us, and the sense I have is that we’re floundering, even those of us no longer content with “go along to get along.” Goodness knows I am. We didn’t practice, and now we don’t have the right thing to do embedded in our bones. It feels so terribly pointless to start now with the little things, as I am trying to do—will there even be time for a genuine impact?—and yet the big things overwhelm.

What Dorothea said. Me, I haven’t entirely worked out what my first steps are going to be, but for starters, I’m going to finally become a card-carrying member of the ACLU. And see if Planned Parenthood of Virginia needs any volunteers. And next week, I’m going to my first City Council meeting. On Monday, they’ll be voting on a resolution to condemn Virginia’s so-called Marriage Affirmation Act, and I want to be there.

I have the same sense of shame at my earlier political apathy. May it turn to something productive that leaves the world a marginally happier place.

Election day diary

This is what my November 2nd looked like:

6:45 a.m. Alarm goes off for the second time, conclusively waking me up. I stagger out of bed to the sounds of NPR hosts saying "It’s ELECTION DAY!"

8:00 a.m. Breakfasted, caffeinated, groomed, and dressed, I head out the door, pausing to grab a warm jacket that later turns out to be completely unnecessary on an unusually warm and mostly cloudless day.

8:15 a.m. I arrive at my local polling place. It’s surprisingly quiet, with only a few people in line. There’s a momentary hold-up: apparently, since I registered by mail, they want a proof of my address as well as my voter card. Fortunately, I’ve come prepared with my electric bill. The poll workers at the table look relieved and apologize for the inconvenience. Another shows me how to work the touch-screen in the voting booth. I ask if the machines provide a paper receipt, and the poll worker says no, but there’ll still be a paper record locked inside the machine, which they’ll use in the event of a recount. Satisfied, I punch the four boxes on the screen, hit "Cast Vote," and I’m out of there, sporting my "I Voted" sticker.

8:35 a.m. Crossing the street on my way to work, I pass a small cluster of students who are holding up Kerry/Edwards signs and waving at passing cars. I grin broadly at the girl nearest me. She looks at my sticker and says "Yay!" and I say "Yay!" in response. We smile at each other and I walk on.

8:45 a.m. Arrive at the library. My colleagues are all wearing "I Voted" stickers of their own. We compare early-morning-voting notes. Everyone else’s polling places were jammed, so we conjecture that my precinct has a greater proportion of students, most of whom don’t have to be at work by nine.

10:00 a.m. Sit in on meeting. More comparing of early-morning-voting notes; more reports of jammed polls. Discussion turns to actual meeting for next hour and a half, which is something of a relief.

11:30 a.m. Meeting ends. I get coffee and a highly unhealthy donut from the library cafe, then head to my desk. Unsurprisingly, the Electoral Vote Predictor is awfully slow to load today.

12:00 noon. First reference shift of the day. Some, but far from all, people in the main hall of the library are wearing stickers.

1:00 p.m. Lunch hour. Weather’s still magnificent, so I mosey across Grounds eating my tomato sandwich and head to Heartwood Books for some browsing. (I find Elizabeth Bishop’s letters and Anne Carson’s Glass, Irony, and God. It’s a good used-bookstore day.) The store owner sees my sticker and asks what the turnout was like. More comparison of notes (see above).

2:00 p.m. Very quiet hour staffing the information desk in our new building. No major news to be found on the web except "huge turnouts everywhere."

2:30 p.m. or thereabouts. My sticker falls off. I reaffix it.

3:00 p.m. Back at the reference desk. More people seem to have voted. I was kind of hoping for last-minute questions about how to find one’s polling place, but there aren’t any. People are starting to report big turnouts in other places in Virginia. I don’t expect Kerry to win here, but the sheer numbers are encouraging. Afterwards, I go back to my desk and attempt to do some reading and research, but with my mind elsewhere.

6:15 p.m. I catch the bus home. A handmade sign inside the bus reads "VOTE!" I sit behind a group of guys who’ve evidently been playing soccer or ultimate frisbee or something of the sort, if their muddy shirts are any indication. One is describing how he waited fifteen minutes for the man in front of him at the polls to finish voting. (Some voters remain undecided to the last? But I suspect it’s more likely to be due to the two state constitutional amendments on the ballot, both rather minor and obscure and couched in legalese.)

6:25 p.m. Home again. I’m starving. I cook some salmon on a bed of rice, make a salad and pour a glass of wine.

7:00 p.m. Election coverage begins. I sit down with my dinner to watch. Virginia election results aren’t in yet. (Update: they just called it. Virginia’s gone red. Oh well.) Faint sounds of music can be heard outside my window — some of my neighbors are evidently marking the occasion by throwing a party.

Without knowing the ultimate outcome: I’m impressed with how calmly everything went today. No inter-party hostility that I could see, no polling shenanigans, no flaring tempers, no doomsday scenarios. That’s what I’ll be holding onto for the rest of the evening. And with that, I’m signing off so I can call a few friends in other states and hear what their own election day was like.

No doubt I’m preaching to the choir, but…

If you haven’t yet done so, just go out and vote already!

I’ll be posting an election day diary tonight or tomorrow. I’m twitching with nerves today. But even if (heavens forfend) we have a repeat of the vote count fiasco of 2000, this election will be remembered as the one that got lots and lots of formerly apathetic people interested in the democratic process again. And because of that, I’m more optimistic than I’ve been in weeks.

Getting inside other people’s heads, part 1 (or: Why bother reading books?)

Michelle, earlier this month, posted about her disgruntlement with the kind of student whose only frame of reference is his or her own experience, and who is disinclined to consider any other possible frames of reference. As Michelle puts it:

It seems that particular mindset just isn’t embracing one of the aspects of literature i love so much — which is the rich and valuable insight you have to other cultures and other values, despite the common threads of humanity. … I think it’s similar to how annoyed I get when someone offers an opinion in class and then backs it up with a "well, that’s the way it is where I come from" type of remark. It seems to suggest that they draw all their conclusions on the narrow history of themselves, their small miniscule environment, not even within the world at large, but miniscule in the space of all of humanity and history.

I recognized this feeling of aggravation immediately. My own experiences as student and teacher weren’t always like this (far from it), but when the "that’s the way it is where I come from" attitude surfaced, it always drove me around the bend. I recall, for instance, a class centering around Renaissance music and art that I took as an undergrad, wherein one of my classmates opined, during a discussion of Erasmus’s life and works, that she didn’t understand why the Protestant Reformation was such a big deal; her campus church group included both Catholics and Protestants, "and we may not agree, but we don’t get into fights." Never mind that we were talking about a period of history when people not only got into fights over theology but fought prolonged and bloody wars over it, complete with burnings at the stake and all that; my classmate seemed to think that if it didn’t match her own experiences, it didn’t make sense.

My worst teaching semester was one in which my attempts to get my students to take an interest in the readings were greeted with a chorus of "We couldn’t relate to that! It was boring!" whenever the reading was something that didn’t precisely reflect their lives and interests. Finally, in a fit of utter frustration at one "I couldn’t relate to it" comment too many, I told them that the point of getting an education was learning that there was an entire world out there that they hadn’t experienced yet. I said that "relate-ability" wasn’t the best criterion to judge what they read, because it ruled out an immense amount of material that they might someday find interesting if they were less preoccupied with reading only books with which they could identify. They listened politely, but they weren’t convinced. I still consider that class to be my biggest failure as a teacher because I never managed to convince them of that point, and my impassioned speech in favor of reading about the unfamiliar, the strange, and the outside-the-sphere-of-personal-experience wasn’t articulate enough to reach them.

I don’t want to dwell on this, because it’s a depressing memory. What I do want to dwell on is what all this says about why people read literature at all. My students, or at least the ones who complained that they couldn’t relate to the readings, wanted reading to be like looking in a mirror: if they couldn’t see themselves in it, it didn’t hold their interest. I wanted them to see it more as a window — a lighted one showing the inside of someone else’s house to passers-by in the early evening, or a top-floor one that gives a vista over the roofs that you’d never see from the street. I’m much more of a window-reader than a mirror-reader, but I’m not out to dismiss the mirror view of literature. I think, ultimately, literature is both: a window where you can sometimes see your own reflection but with other things showing through it.*

So this will be part 1 of a series, because if I keep going it’ll be a monstrously long post. I think I’ll post on the mirror view of literature and the window view of literature separately. It’s probably going to end up being an attempt to see, window-like, into the heads of mirror-readers.

* An image stolen from any number of sources but probably from John Donne’s "A Valediction of my Name in the Window."

Go to Kentucky, underwear, lemon

Bill Keaggy collects found grocery lists and exhibits them at his site. As a recent New York Times article on his grocery list collection explains, entire personalities can be pieced together (or not) from these found documents:

”Some people pass judgment on the things they buy,” Keaggy says. At the end of one list, the shopper wrote ”Bud Light” and then ”good beer.” Another scribbled ”good loaf of white bread.” Some pass judgment on themselves, like the shopper who wrote ”read, stay home or go somewhere, I act like my mom, go to Kentucky, underwear, lemon.”

(I find myself unaccountably cheered by imagining the person who wrote the last list. The sequence "I act like my mom, go to Kentucky, underwear, lemon" is weirdly poetic, somehow. There’s also something fascinating about the way people categorize their grocery purchases, e.g. "milk, cereal, food, parmesan.")

He also collects pre-owned bookmarks, random junk from the street, unspectacular doorways, and rocks shaped like shoes. It’s odd: I lack the collector trait myself (well, except for a few specialized oddments like old postcards with scenes of cities at night), but I have always been rather envious of people who collect things, even though I know that if I were to collect things in any great number, I would have been buried under an avalanche of junk many years ago.