Reasons why I’m generally pleased with myself tonight

Today I helped someone track down information about a University of Virginia alumnus who came here in the 1850s and who was known by his middle name, which, of course, wasn’t listed in full in the University catalogues. But after much searching I found him nonetheless. By the time I was done answering that question, I felt like a History Detective.* It was very exciting.

Also, I have scored a ticket to the first concert of the sold-out Tuesday Evening Concert Series next week. On the program: Vivaldi, Corelli, Geminiani, Telemann, and W. F. Bach. There’s a John Ashbery poem that begins "It was a night for listening to Corelli, Geminiani, / Or Manfredini" ("Someone You Have Seen Before," in April Galleons), and next Tuesday will be such a night, even if I did get a seat with a partially obstructed view of the stage.

* One of the earliest things I wanted to be when I grew up was a detective, but I grew discouraged when I realized that my neighborhood didn’t offer any mysteries that an eight-year-old could solve. I remember being annoyed that the gang on Scooby-Doo stumbled upon mysteries everywhere they went, they couldn’t even go on a vacation at Velma’s uncle’s place without running into something to investigate, and it just wasn’t fair that such luck never happened to me. Then I transferred my career aspirations to archaeology instead.

End-of-week link roundup

The Science of Music: an exhibit from the Exploratorium. Covering such eternal questions as why everyone sings better in the shower, why your voice sounds freakishly weird on tape, and what makes a song become an earworm. Also, I spent an inordinate amount of time playing with the Dot Mixer. (Via the Scout Report.)

The Deliberately Concealed Garments project, an exhibit of clothing found in walls and other hiding places. There really is an archive for everything. I’m fascinated by the stories implied by these bits of clothing — the collar of a child’s sailor suit found in a wall, old boots and a candlestick in a bricked-up bread oven — and by the way we will never know for sure why they were hidden. (Via Librarians’ Index to the Internet.)

Languagehat and wood s lot celebrate Wallace Stevens’ birthday. I’ve posted about Stevens on numerous occasions before, but (sorry, Dale!) I’m about to do it again. Here’s a current favorite.

Tea

When the elephant’s-ear in the park
Shrivelled in frost,
And the leaves on the paths
Ran like rats,
Your lamp-light fell
On shining pillows,
Of sea-shades and sky-shades,
Like umbrellas in Java.

Very abridged debate commentary

Am not going to post at length on the first presidential debate. It’s past my bedtime already. Must catch up on sleep.

However, I have to say that my good mood from watching Kerry mop the floor with Bush was perfectly capped off by watching the commentators on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart fling around words like "litotes" and "anadiplosis." (Anadiplosis! I wrote about anadiplosis in one of my dissertation chapters! My name is Amanda, and I am a classical rhetoric geek.)

River algorithms and the essay

Via Arts & Letters Daily, a long essay in praise of the essay form in its circuitous truth-seeking glory, from which this struck me:

The Meander (aka Menderes) is a river in Turkey. As you might expect, it winds all over the place. But it doesn’t do this out of frivolity. The path it has discovered is the most economical route to the sea. [6]

The river’s algorithm is simple. At each step, flow down. For the essayist this translates to: flow interesting. Of all the places to go next, choose the most interesting.

— Paul Graham, "The Age of the Essay"

I wish I’d had this to hand to my students back when I was teaching first-year writing, because that’s exactly what I always wanted them to understand, but could never quite manage to convey. But I’ll keep "at each step, flow down" at the back of my head, and see what it does for my own writing.

Epicurism

And so away to Stevenage, and staid till a showre was over, and so rode easily to Welling, where we supped well, and had two beds in the room and so lay single, and still remember it that of all the nights that ever I slept in my life I never did pass a night with more epicurism of sleep; there being now and then a noise of people stirring that waked me, and then it was a very rainy night, and then I was a little weary, that what between waking and then sleeping again, one after another, I never had so much content in all my life, and so my wife says it was with her.

Samuel Pepys, diary entry for Monday 23 September 1661

Has anyone else ever managed to write quite like this about sleeping and waking? Entries like this are why I have Pepys’ diary amongst my Bloglines feeds.

Ah, youth

Overheard on the campus bus:

Student talking to friend on cell phone about party the previous night: "You puked?" [slight pause] "You puked on her?" [more conversation, and then:] "So what are your plans for tonight?"

I so don’t regret my socially reclusive, non-party-hearty-ing college years anymore…

Now I’m scared.

Jesus H. Christ on a raft.

"The Bush vision is quite radical. He essentially is dreaming of a world where there is no employer-provided insurance," said Uwe Reinhardt, a health economist at Princeton University. "You buy your own insurance, but you pay the first $2,000 to $4,000 per year out of your own pocket."

(Via Sappho’s Breathing.)

So, let’s see: what are my options if Bush gets reelected and his "no more employer-provided insurance" plan succeeds?

1) Get an MBA and head for a more lucrative career in management instead of librarianship, because I sure as hell want to be earning a lot of money if I’m going to have to sock away my income in a flexible spending account.
2) Find someone rich to marry.
3) Pray really really hard that I don’t get sick, or get hit by a car, or anything else unexpected that would incur major medical expenses.
4) Look for work in Canada. Frankly, option 4 looks better with each passing day.

There should be a conclusion to this post, but I can’t think of anything more articulate to say than "I’m not joking about Canada" and "Jesus H. Christ on a raft."

Personal anthology: George Peele

Just caught the first cold of the season. Too congested and run-down to write about anything profound tonight. So I’m posting obscure sixteenth-century poetry instead. I like this one especially for its rhythms.

Bethsabe’s Song

Hot sun, cool fire, tempered with sweet air,
Black shade, fair nurse, shadow my white hair;
Shine sun; burn, fire; breathe, air, and ease me;
Black shade, fair nurse, shroud me and please me:
Shadow, my sweet nurse, keep me from burning,
Make not my glad cause cause of mourning.
    Let not my beauty’s fire
    Inflame unstaid desire,
    Nor pierce any bright eye
    That wandereth lightly.

— George Peele

(Via the Wondering Minstrels.)

And now: movie rental, undemanding knitting, lots of tea and so to bed.

What does dactylic hexameter smell like?

About a year ago, back at ye olde blog, I wrote a post about olfactory memory that I well-intentionedly meant to follow up on, making it the beginning of a sequence of mini-essays on the five senses, but then didn’t. I haven’t completely abandoned the idea, but I couldn’t think of anything clever to write about the other four senses. This is the danger of writing things in series when one is not the most persistent of people.

I see from the Guardian Unlimited, however, that not only do literary types like myself think about scents, but perfumers sometimes think about literature:

Smell being the most evocative of the senses, it is not surprising that literature is full of aromas. Now an Italian perfumière, Laura Tonnato, has tried to do justice to the olfactory imagination of some of her favourite authors, concocting five scents to match five odorous moments in classic novels.

In a promotion organised by Waterstone’s, visitors to the bookseller’s Piccadilly branch will, from next week, be able to experience these smells on the five different floors of the store.

The scents include the obligatory Proustian madeleine, "violets that woke the memory of dead romances" from Wilde’s Portrait of Dorian Gray, and an attempt at capturing the reek of 18th-century Paris to go with Patrick Suskind’s Perfume. Could this be a new form of literary criticism? I think I’ve missed my calling. I should have been a perfumer. The language of perfume description, like the language of wine description, has always seemed wonderfully poetic to me in its futility and its indirection: how do you describe a smell in words, anyway? You can identify its notes individually, but after a certain point you have to start using metaphors. So it makes sense, in an inverted-logic kind of way, that someone might choose to interpret heightened language by designing a scent to go with it.

On a sort of related note, today I was in one of downtown Charlottesville’s many fancy little home boutiques, looking at Furnishings I Can’t Afford Now But Maybe Someday I Will. Intrigued by a whiff of a cologne called Virgilio, and by its classical name, I tried some on. To my nose, it smelled like crushed black peppercorns mixed with something green and herbal. It didn’t immediately remind me of the Aeneid, or Mantua, though it’s supposed to evoke "the clear morning of a classical Latin landscape," and I suspect it would make me smell overwhelmingly peppery if I wore it on a regular basis; still, I’m tempted to go back for a bottle of it, just to see if I can trace the Virgilian allusion with my nose.

Rather personal post with too many instances of the word “blog” and its derivatives

Definition of blogospheric small-world-after-all weirdness: discovering the blog of an ex with whom one had a traumatic breakup during one’s younger and more drama-prone years. Oy.

Definition of blog-facilitated reassurance: looking at said ex’s blog and thinking "Thank god. We really did both grow into different people, and I really did get over her ages ago. Well, that’s all right then."

Definition of blogospheric paranoia: suddenly realizing that said ex could make a reciprocal blog-discovery, and nervously trying to calculate the number of degrees of separation between her blogroll and one’s own. (A., in the mathematically unlikely but still possible event that you’re reading this, don’t worry: I have no intention of reopening anything.)

Er… [re-donning mantle of independent-scholarly objectivity] I’m sure there’s a thesis about online identity and overlapping social circles in all of this somewhere. Has anyone else out there wondered about degrees of separation between any two given bloggers? Counted intervening links? And has anyone, dare I ask, had the find-an-ex experience? Discuss. (I, meanwhile, will be in my living room watching goofy reality TV until the feeling of blast-from-the-past weirdness subsides.)